The future of the Hosking Garden is worrying Masterton residents alarmed that the garden - Masterton's swimming pool from the early 1900s until the 1960s - may be demolished.
The concept plan assumed demolition of the sunken garden and replacing it with an imprint - see 1B above.
If you look along the Dixon Street side of the promenade walk on the plan, the Sunken Garden imprint is flush with the edge of the walk, whereas the actual sunken garden is sticking out into this promenade area.
I think the council were a bit quick in moving on landscaping the adjoining area in line with the new plan. The Hosking Garden now sticks out like a sore thumb into the promenade.
The entrance to the park - almost opposite Aratoi - has been realigned in accordance with the Richard Fowler plan which has made no attempt to connect the new lawns and gardens with the Hosking Garden. Instead, the Hosking Garden has been left isolated and awkward looking.
If the Council votes to retain the Hosking Garden instead of the imprint, some rework of adjoining lawns, beds and pathways will be needed to ensure the garden is connected to the rest of the park.
And I'd like to see it planted more imaginatively in something other than the usual hectic plantings of annuals.
Di and Ian Grant highlight a further concern, writing in the Times-Age:
We do not believe the Council has the right to remove the sunken garden until it can tell citizens exactly what it will be replaced with and why this is demonstrably better than what we have now."
The only item on the Council website about the Queen Elizabeth Park makeover was the concept plan already noted above.
The Council has missed a great publicity opportunity with detailed plan on their website, and a scale model on display in the Aratoi foyer for anyone who wanted to have a look
It will be interesting to see which side prevails when the Council votes on the future of the Hosking Garden on Wednesday.